felix winkelmann wrote:
On 9/7/06, Brandon J. Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So no, I do not quite trust your benchmarking
methodologies. I do not expect that you made things up about -Os, I
imagine you tested it somehow. But, you may have undersampled it.
The main reason -Os is used is that the generated output binaries are
significantly smaller, and runtime performance is nearly identical
to -Os.
But I'm just a optimization jock, what do I know...
Shit, I'm really annoyed.
How many optimization jocks have you had working on Chicken in the past,
jockeying about stuff? Not enough if you're actually annoyed. ;-)
Dude, I hopped from OCaml to Bigloo to Chicken, I'm sure you see a
pattern there. I made the smallest trade in performance that I could,
in exchange for usability.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
