On 1/16/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/16/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, timeout is also used for thread-join!, mutex-lock! and
> mutex-unlock! in srfi-18.
> It'd be more consistent to have */ms procedures for these above.
> Or, since timeout for these procedures including thread-sleep! can be
> a time object,
> introducing time->milliseconds and milliseconds->time would be sufficient.
>
I prefer the latter solution. Could you write a ticket at
http://trac.callcc.org for
this?
Sure, and done.
With the latter solution, we don't need thread-sleep!/ms, right?
--daishi
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
