Matthew Welland scripsit: > What is the right way to do this? I resorted to using :
I like the definition (lambda (f) (not (= f f)), which depends on the fact that NaN is not numerically equal to NaN. You can define "infinite?" as (lambda (f) (= f (+ f f))). -- "Well, I'm back." --Sam John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
