On 1/30/07, Tony Sidaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope.  This is what I meant to post.

 ((or (eof-object? ln) (eq? n 0)) (if (eof-object? ln) (reverse
lns)(reverse (cons ln lns)))) ) )


Thanks for reporting this, Tony.

The bug has been fixed and the fix should be available in the darcs
repo shortly.


cheers,
felix


_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to