On 2/9/07, Arto Bendiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/9/07, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see. I understand that the structure doesn't have a parent pointer,
> but I'm not sure if this feature can be wrapped on top of the current things.
I simply meant that you can use (define-record) to wrap your own
structure around the environment structure, and include a parent
pointer (and any other needed goodies) in that.
That doesn't sound so nice.
I don't want to care about the parent pointer when I call (eval foo env).
The layered lookup of bindings should be done internally.
Maybe I could just wait for your egg, and discuss later.
Daishi
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
