On 4/4/07, Arto Bendiken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/4/07, Zbigniew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is great. I've been impressed with MacPorts so far.
>
> Out of curiosity, can we specify special optimization flags for this
> build? I tend to compile Chicken with aggressive optimization. Based
> on the output from the build it looks like no optimization is done at
> all, not even -O (!)
Good question!
I haven't actually yet seen any portfiles that included explicit -O
flags, so I'm not sure what the MacPorts policy/practice is; I'll look
into it.
Thinking about it, though, shouldn't we specify a reasonable
optimization level by default in the Chicken distribution? (Felix?)
The default options are usually "-Os -fomit-frame-pointer". This generates
reasonably fast code and relatively small binaries.
cheers,
felix
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
