On May 14, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 5/14/07, Peter Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May
14, 2007 at 11:55:31AM -0400, Brandon Van Every wrote:
> Any static linking horror stories out there?
I CAN'T make statically linked C programs on OS X using the compiler
supplied with Xcode 2.mumble. It's missing a static crt0.o (There is
a crt1.o in /usr/lib. I've never bothered fighting to get gcc to use
that instead.)
Ok Mac OS X users, what say you? Should we tie your hands for your
own good, or give you the freedom to cut off your own fingers?
I don't care about static linking. What would be nice is an OS X
framework for the chicken runtime. It'd be a lot easier to distribute
to people who want to run a program written in chicken without having
to install the full thing (Compiler, interpreter, runtime libraries,
etc.). Universal binary support to go along with that would be nice
too. The latter is easy to do. (Add '-arch i386 -arch ppc' to the
cflags used by the chicken compiler, and I /think/ everything will
work automagically. I'll test that.)
--
Shawn W.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
