I found a solution:
(define-syntax testsyntax
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ((char digit ...)
...))
`(,(testsyntax 'part (char digit ...))
...))
((_ 'part (char digit ...))
'((char digit) ...))))
Are there more elegant solutions? ;)
On 6/13/07, Daniel Sadilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I'm stuck with the following problem. I want a macro that called this way:
(testsyntax
((a 1 2)
(b 3 4)))
Returns this:
(((a 1) (a 2))
((b 3) (b 4)))
My bet was:
(define-syntax testsyntax
(syntax-rules ()
((_ ((char digit ...)
...))
'(((char digit) ...)
...)))))
But this macro returns:
(((a 1) (b 2))
((a 3) (b 4)))
Notice the difference in the characters. The ellipsis just doesn't do
what I want ;)
Can be accomplished what I want with define-syntax? Or do I have to
use defmacro?
Best regards
Daniel Sadilek
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
