Okay, I hadn't thought about compound names -- I will try that, and
hopefully it will not cause a lot of clutter in the node names. I did
think about adding an argument to specify the order of pages, but that
increases the amount of user intervention required to produce a
document. Perhaps I will add that as an optional argument. Thanks for
your suggestions.
-Ivan
John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ivan Raikov scripsit:
>
>> 2. There cannot be two sectional units of the same name, anywhere in
>> the set of wiki files: every sectional unit in the wiki document
>> becomes a node in the Texinfo document, and Texinfo does not permit
>> nodes of the same name. In other words, you cannot have a subsection
>> called "create-directory" in the e.g. wiki page "Unit posix" and the
>> wiki page "chicken-setup".
>
> This can be resolved by assigning compound names such as "Unit posix -
> create-directory" to Texinfo nodes derived from sectional units.
>
>> 3. The ordering of sections in the Texinfo document depends on the
>> order in which the wiki files were parsed.
>
> I think this is a feature. Texinfo documents are often read linearly,
> certainly in TeX (or Postscript or hard copy) form, whereas the wiki
> has no inherent linearity. The Texinfo creator should accept an
> ordered list of pages to process and use that to determine the final order.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
