Arto Bendiken wrote:
Now, I know that marring the purity of Scheme with arguably gratuitous [surface] syntax won't appeal to everyone,
I agree with this. I even have a problem reading the [] as an alternative to () that some people use. I even kind of long for scsh-style SRE's because I dislike non-sexp-syntaxes so much. (quote and quasiquote are grandfathered in because it's so useful to toggle between data and code.)
Sunnan _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
