Stephen Ramsay scripsit:
> "I can't speak for _all_ Java programmers, but I'm perfectly happy to
> acknowledge that there may be better languages out there. Java is just
> the best that I know for the job I do."
>
> Dude, relax. Then take a moment to contemplate the bizarre logic of
> this statement. Then relax again.
I don't see how it's so bizarre. I'd paraphrase it thus:
I admit that Haskell (or whatever) might make my job much
easier, but I don't *know* any Haskell, and I do know
Java, and it's definitely better than Apple II Basic for
web programming, which is what they pay me for, so I guess
I'll use Java.
--
XQuery Blueberry DOM John Cowan
Entity parser dot-com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Abstract schemata http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
XPointer errata
Infoset Unicode BOM --Richard Tobin
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
