On 7/8/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin DeMello scripsit:
> No, I don't want to pass str into the foreign function, i want str to
> *be* the foreign function. That is, I want to use a variable rather
> than an explicit string, or a macro that generates and inserts a
> string into the right place.
Since foreign-lambda* is itself a macro, your only hope is to write
a macro that generates a foreign-lambda* with everything in the right
places.
Thanks, will fight with that.
martin
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
