John Cowan scripsit: > Excellent! Can you put it in the repository? Also, I think you should > consider using the unspecified object as Lua nil; conceptually they > are pretty much the same. That frees up symbols (as well as strings) > to be translated to Lua strings, since Lua strings serve some of the > purposes of symbols in Scheme (they are immutable, in particular).
I just found out that Lua interns all strings, which makes them even more like symbols. So Scheme->Lua should accept either symbols or strings, but Lua->Scheme should return symbols. -- That you can cover for the plentiful John Cowan and often gaping errors, misconstruals, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and disinformation in your posts [EMAIL PROTECTED] through sheer volume -- that is another misconception. --Mike to Peter _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
