On 7/30/07, Shawn Rutledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/29/07, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The backtrace is misleading: what fails is the "(pp ... o)" on a closed > > port (closed by evaluating the "(exit)"). This should actually show up > > in the error message. Do you run this test in the interpreter or do you > > compile it? > > Quite right. When I compile it, pp is the bottom item in the trace. > > Sorry for the stupid question. >
Not stupid at all. Hope it works now. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
