Ivan Raikov scripsit: > > I prefer the view of the ANSI/ISO C standards committee: "Old code > > is important; old implementations are not." Even Sun has now been > > dragged kicking and screaming into the ISO C age. > > I most certainly do not consider ISO C or C++ to be good language > standards. In my opinion, a programming language standard should > encourage and support the proliferation of high-quality > implementations.
If there aren't a lot of high-quality C implementations, that is not the fault of the ISO C standard. > Compare with C++: I said nothing of C++, which should not be bracketed with C. -- Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far John Cowan coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that http://ccil.org/~cowan O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word [EMAIL PROTECTED] to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All she there told him, ruing death for friend so young, James Joyce, Ulysses algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay. "Oxen of the Sun" _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
