Benedikt Rosenau wrote:
Anyway, I propose the following: please keep dependencies between
eggs small.
I disagree; sometimes, it seems better to split common code to libraries
than to have duplication. Dependencies can be hell, but so can duplication.
Further, no mutual dependencies (A needs B, and B needs
A) should be created.
I guess I can agree with that. If that should happen, here are two
solutions to that:
Either:
1) create a third package, C, with the stuff from A that B depends on,
so that A depends on B and C, and B depends on C, or:
2) join the two packages.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
