On Feb 1, 2008 8:40 AM, Zbigniew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a huge disparity and is worth investigating, unless one of the > master Chicken hackers can explain it right off the bat. >
I couldn't, but it is worth mentioning that the performance of a chicken-compiled program is extremely sensitive to stack-size, activation frame size, cache behaviour and allocation rate. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
