On Feb 12, 2008 2:12 PM, Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and given that there will be an influx of people working on lots of stuff... > what do people think about setting some style/indent rules/suggestions for > code?
For me, it's Emacs' (indent-sexp), with scheme-mode's adjustments for Scheme code. You could probably suggest a max-line-length, but beyond "use conventional Scheme indentation" I'm not sure what else you could do. Does anyone have a reference to a Scheme style guide? I know I've seen one, but I can't think where. This lazy Emacs user is spoiled by built-in functionality. On the naming of things, it would be very hard at this point in the game to enforce a prefix: naming convention across all egg procedures (as in http:GET, contrasted with the gazillion 'format' definitions). It would be helpful, iff there were also syntactic support for not requiring the prefixes when a module is "imported", as mzscheme and Common Lisp do. I've worked on a module system that addresses that, as I'm sure many others have, but we have no comprehensive solution. G _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
