On Feb 12, 2008 7:16 PM, Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:10:28AM -0600, Ozzi wrote: > > This is perhaps a different concern, but I wonder if there would be value in > > designating certain eggs as "part of" Chicken, and holding these eggs to a > > stricter standard of documentation. > > Why do you want to make a distinction? > > The whole point of the note on the wiki was that we need _one_ documentation > system. The current system sucks, because you keep switching interfaces. > Say you're looking for some documentation, so you search using the wiki > system. However, the docs you're looking for happen to be written in eggdoc > or the legacy HTML documentation. Besides not being able to search these > docs, when you visit them, you go to another site and you lose the > navigational tools you get in the wiki.
Note that all documentation for installed eggs can be found in HTML format in $PREFIX/lib/chicken/3/index.html. That's about as easy as it can get. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
