On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:25:35PM -0600, Mark Fredrickson wrote: > Hi all, > > 1. Our primary focus is on updating documentation where it currently > resides (wiki, svn, etc) in the format it currently uses. Getting the > documentation that exists current is a big task as it is. Let's not > worry about moving documentation just yet.
Yes, this is one of the things I put on the wiki page. Could you (and others, of course) add concrete points where documentation is missing/incomplete/out of date to the wiki page? An important part about a Hackathon is that there is a concrete list of things to get done. > 4. Let's try to dedicate some time to infrastructure improvements: > Mario suggested expanding SVN wiki tags, it sounds like the *-commit > hooks could use a refactoring, etc. As Zbigniew said, infrastructure > lasts. Good idea. Could you please add these points to the wiki page? > There are a lot of smart people on this list with good ideas. Like > Ivan, I'm a Scheme fan for the wild-west aspect. I'm not tied to any > programming paradigm. I can experiment with many styles. I think we > should take a similar attitude towards our documentation. :-) For now, I think this is the best way to go. The bikeshed discussion is going nowhere. (unless Elf comes up with something we can agree on) Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgpHSrWPvLNm8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
