> If redundancy were a reason for deleting egg functionality, we have > about seven object systems to get rid of. ;-)
Ah, but if you pick any two of those, they will have their differences! In this case, however, *absolutely* all usages of the new code are supported by the old one and it is *impossible* for a user to find any difference between them (other than the fact that orders' function is called cmp-key and the combinator's make-</key) no matter how hard they try. IMHO case that should be enough of a reason not to add the copy of the code in another egg with a different name. Alejo. http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/ _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
