On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:56:06AM +0100, Leonardo Valeri Manera
wrote:
> On 16/03/2008, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Should I just use one of those, then? Do they define
> > syntax-rules?
>
> Yup. Any one of those 3 defines syntax-rules.
Ha! That does it. (use hart), then (use riaxpander), then:
(define-syntax p-tr
(syntax-rules
()
[(p-tr stuff)
(p (@ (class "foo")) (text: (ctr stuff)))]))
then my code with p-tr in it works fine.
Thanks all!
-Robin
--
Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
