Hi Felix - thanks for the reply! I had another look at the difference between posixunix.scm and posixpsp.scm and they are pretty much the same except:
- the psp has no concept of users and groups - no posix memory mapped I/O functions - some minor timezone stuff (there are psp specifc functions I can use) - some uts stuff (again, there are psp specific functions I can use that come close) So in total, there's about 22 functions that are different. I'll update posixunix.scm instead with cond-expand's with psp specific functions and make those other changes you suggested :) I'll have another patch in a day or two. Cheers, Adam On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:31 AM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, cool! Looks very good. Would it be possible to reuse posixunix.scm > (probably using some cond-expand's to conditionally compile certain > sections), or are the differences so large that a separate posix*.scm > is required? > > A few more suggestions: > > - don't use "//" style comments > - add "psp" to C_software_type (generally whatever is right > for software-type, machine-type, build-platform, etc.) > > > cheers, > felix > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
