hi, On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2008, at 12:04 pm, Hans Bulfone wrote: >> >> whether with-output-to-file returns the current-output-port to its old >> value when you escape from its thunk is explicitly undefined by r5rs. > > I would argue, though, that it *should*... And it'd be easy to > implement it to do so, would it not?
yes, i also think it should. bye, hans. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
