On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Lui Fungsin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My question is, whether the WITH-OPEN-PIPE macro, as an abstraction, > should handle SIGPIPE (unlikely). If not, what's the preferred way to > do this handling properly in chicken?
I recommend not to use "ignore-errors" and handle I/O errors explicitly, for example with condition-case. With an error handler wrapped, I get no hangs: it is waiting for input. It may be that you have to flush the output before the prompt make it visible (or use "print*"). cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
