On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:30 AM, naruto canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > I thinks there is a bug in big numbers extension or somewhere else... > I am not sure. >
>From a quick peek I can infer at least the following: the compiler does currently not support bignum literals, the large exact number in "random-parameters" is silently coerced into an inexact number, so "random" will always return an inexact result. Replacing "9999..." with (string->number "999...") should help. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
