On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:00:09PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: > I'm waiting for the next bug. But basically, this thing is getting > better and better. I really recommend everybody to give it a try.
Seconded. I'm using it full-time now and it's great. > Programming with modules catches many unbound-variable > errors and missing library uses, allows to use shorter names and one > can finally code > extensively with macros, without having to worry about compile-time/ > run-time issues (well, with a batch-compiler there will always > be situations where one has to be aware of the separation, > but this is vastly better than fiddling with `syntax' and > `require-at-runtime' setup-options). It also allows you to remove all those lame foo-egg: prefixes from your exported symbols, and prefix them at import time with your favorite prefix or none at all. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
pgp75GyifTZMU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
