On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It assumes that it can call "read" on a port when peek-char
> returns #\( and assumes that, once "read" read the expression, can
> continue to read from the port right after the corresponding #\) .
> Unfortunately chicken's read has already read from the port until the
> next #\( - so the SRFI-49 code gets confused. Does anybody have a nice
> Scheme reader in pure Scheme or Chicken-Scheme at hand?
Can you reproduce the issue in a short example? I don't see the
issue, as I understand it, here:
#;> (with-input-from-string "(1) 2 (3)"
(lambda () (print (peek-char) (read) (peek-char) (read) (read))))
((1) 2(3)
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
