Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 12:54 +0200 schrieb Tobia Conforto: > Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > > Users however have a chance to use [...] full (interpreted) Scheme > > in their own sandbox. > > Then, may I ask what is wrong with these suggestions?
Almost nothing. Except that those would need a huge amount of modifications to an existing code base, which runs for several years already, just to duplicate some functionality, which is already present in the chicken core. So the question - for me - is why should I follow the expensive route? BTW: how did that one get into this thread? > > John Cowan wrote: > > 2) Use a modified version of "eval" to execute it that counts ticks. > > Vincent Manis wrote: > > 3) Use a modified version of eval that polls for a thread > > termination request. > > > Tobia > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
