On Aug 18, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Elf wrote:
srfi-19 is broken in several ways right now and will be refactored
soon.
Please file bug reports.
Also, the SRFI-19 egg uses the numbers extension.
-elf
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Hi Kon,
I ran into a problem with SRFI-19 formatting. (Being lazy) I'm not
(yet) using the chicken egg, but the version I made up years ago.
Now I
found this bug, which - if there are no other tricks in your code -
should affect the egg too: in date->string the ~s should hit
<snip>
Could you check if this applies to the egg's version?
The reference implementation is unchanged in this instance.
Should be straightforward to modify the srfi-19-io to compensate for
the trailing '.0', but the various pieces of the 'number->string'
family, as you imply, might be the better stop.
Please file as a SRFI-19 bug.
best regards
/Jörg
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Best Wishes,
Kon
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
