On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jörg F. Wittenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To sum up: the approach feels not very clean to me. It would be much > more practical to add another argument to make-parameter and have it > support all three parameter designs, wouldn't it? I would not do that - this leads just to API bloat, which we already have enough of. Chicken's behaviour of parameters is AFAICT srfi-conformant. It also is relatively low-level so that I don't like to mess with it. Furthermore, I can't remember having heard any complaints about the current behaviour until now. That there are several different ways of implementing this is true, and none could be considered the "true" way (as can also be seen by reading the (lively) discussions that took place on the SRFI-39 mailing list). cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
