Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit: > The best solution however seem to have a look at wikipedia and ask > around whether this license would be ok: > > http://web.mit.edu/~emin/www/source_code/red_black_tree/index.html
This software is effectively under a 3-clause BSD license with unusual wording: it does not contain any equivalent of the first clause, which says that you can't remove the copyright notice, list of conditions, or disclaimer. Nobody is likely to do so; in any event, removing the copyright notice is fraud. > Chicken has gotten a FFI, hasn't it? Yes. (Language note: "has gotten" in American English means only "has acquired", "has obtained", or the like; it's obsolete in other varieties of English. You want either "has" (AmE or BrE) or "has got" (BrE)). -- You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.ccil.org/~cowan graphs; you have a right to be here. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --DeXiderata by Sean McGrath _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
