Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 19:29 +0100 schrieb david krentzlin: > The last i want is a framework that breaks or works against me as soon > as i need to do things the creators didn't think of.
Again from my perspective (i.e., I'm biased): with askemos.org there is IMHO just one design requirement, which a Scheme programmer can not break: capability distribution and a few more attributes like time of creation, last version number etc. Please tell me if you find anything else. I don't think it's the end of the world. If anything than merely the opposite. > Datastorage is a subject of debate indeed. I personally like some of > the ideas of CLSQL quite much. And i also would like to have a > unifying interface for various backends like the dbi that is present in > allmost any language. Of course it needs to be cooler than those. :) Well, I decided to go with a storage API to a plug in framework. To start with something good for debugging that's an editable format for the meta data, a BLOB for the actual data and a set of named communication channels the object knows (in other words a comparable model to the pi-calculus, what else would a Scheme use as a parallel extension to lambda? ;-). With rscheme I used it's pstore feature too until I learned about scalability issues of it the hard way. > To make long stories short: i want a flexible, usable, practical > framework so that i can stop using ruby and rails. Pardon me. Ruby commited suicide on the rails? Who was ruby? /Jörg _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
