On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > felix winkelmann scripsit: > >> Note that crunch is highly experimental and incomplete. You requirements >> are tough, and you will not find many functional languages that don't require >> GC. Stalin and MLton come to mind (perhaps one can make GC at least >> unlikely, or reduce it to a minimum). > > Stalin uses the Boehm conservative GC. >
That's correct. But (provided Stalin an infer enough allocation information from the code) GC can sometimes be avoided. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
