Peter Bex <Peter.Bex <at> xs4all.nl> writes: > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:27:26AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote: > > The "environments" extension is tolerated but not > > endorsed. As an example, the "apropos" extension does not use the > > "environments" extension but instead relies on undocumented calls. > > That's a good sign that something's wrong. If the apropos egg did not > exist and I would have to write it, I'd start by using the environments > egg. If that doesn't work, I'd consider the environments egg broken. > > > I suggest re-opening the debate. > > Consider it re-opened ;) >
Hi! The environments egg is not fully compatible with the module system. In fact, I think it shouldn't be used at all. Modules provide a renaming context for source code and are conceptually not inspectable runtime structures. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
