2009/9/10 Matthew Welland <[email protected]>
>
> Seconded. I gave some code of mine to someone with instructions to install
> chicken to compile it. He said it doesn't work. Oops. Yeah, You gotta use
> 3.3. Ok, how do I get it. Uh, dunno. He now thinks chicken is a POS. My
> fault for not testing my directions but annoying none the less. I know you
> guys are stretched thin but please consider making going *back* to 3.3 or
> similar easy and obvious from the chicken home page. 4.X should be marked as
> experimental until 80 or 90% of the eggs work IMHO.
>
>
> In other words 4.X is exciting and all but some of us are using chicken to
> get things done and can't afford exciting ...
>
Many eggs are not necessary anymore (like the myriad of html-generation
ones, with sxml-transforms). Where did you get your 80% figure?
You could also provide a list of eggs that are missing for *your usage*. Or
even try porting some.
--Stephen
programmer, n:
A red eyed, mumbling mammal capable of conversing with inanimate
monsters.
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
