Hi On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:20:14 +0200 Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 07:14:30PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote: >> At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:11:03 +0200, >> Peter Bex wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 12:28:45AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote: >> > > Dear Peter, >> > > >> > > Another question regarding with chicken3->chicken4 porting. >> > > I used the http-server-form-posts egg to handle multipart/form-data, >> > > but the egg is not available (or not compatible) for chicken4. >> > > >> > > How can I deal with mime multipart/form-data? >> > >> > I'm afraid nobody has implemented this yet. >> >> Hmm, too bad. >> How does it make sense to port http-server-form-posts to chicken4? > > If I recall correctly, that egg makes the big mistake of reading the > entire post body into memory. It's slightly better to write to temporary > files and provide an API over that. > > It would probably be even better to provide an API that allows the user > to define how to handle the incoming data, but that would require > substantial thinking :) Here are some links to other implementations: Racket: http://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/http.html#(def._((lib._web-server/http/request-structs..rkt)._binding~3afile)) Python: http://github.com/defnull/multipart/ I don't know any of them. I just had the links bookmarked to take a look at them one day (which haven't happened so far). Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
