Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 14:52 +0100 schrieb Moritz Heidkamp: > Hi Jörg, > > Jörg "F. Wittenberger" <[email protected]> writes: > > Though one thing I haven't been able to figure out: is there a way > > encrypt and sign zmg messages? Or would I have to add that on top? > > funny you ask, this has also come up on the ZMQ mailing list > recently. ZMQ is just a transport/messaging system, it doesn't try to do > more than just that and guarantee you that only complete messages will > arrive at your end. What you put into the messages is up to you.
That's tough, unfortunately. In the BALL/Askemos code base, the source signature (x509 only by now) of is an important property used to gain confidence about the current network wide state. > I have an extension for the mailbox-threads egg which adds support for > remote messaging between thread mailboxes via ZMQ. I'll check it in > later today, maybe it is useful for you! Given no trust in the message source, I'll only be able to replace some low level code. Is it true (that's how I read the egg API) that ZMO will only distribute/collect messages? By "only" I mean "not do any removal of re-transmits, no counting of majority of messages delivered or any other handling of synchrony issues"? (I.e., is it really just a transport level thing?) >From skimming across the zmq website one more question. I always asked myself what the point of the poll(2) call is. More efficient that select(2)? Apparently that's the case. ... Which, given that I have some Scheduler patches still pending, I'm almost about to switch those to use pool instead of select, to make both a one time effort to integrate. /J _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
