Felix scripsit: > > I don't see much point in the constructors, really. Schemers already > > understand how to make lists and vectors. > > Sorry, I don't understand this remark.
Ah. I just assumed that random access sequences and linear access sequences were vectors and lists respectively, but looking at the code I see they aren't. What advantages do they have? > I know all these by heart. I figured that, but a sequence library is useful in proportion to its richness, so I'd add more functions. -- John Cowan <[email protected]> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan .e'osai ko sarji la lojban. Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
