Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit: > > A new `equal=?` procedure was added, which works like `equal?` except > > that it ignores exactness when comparing numbers. > > So, which version is NOT R5RS compliant?
`equal?` is R5RS compliant. `equal=?` is not mentioned in R5RS, so it's also R5RS compliant by default. -- Principles. You can't say A is John Cowan <[email protected]> made of B or vice versa. All mass http://www.ccil.org/~cowan is interaction. --Richard Feynman _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
