From: Jörg "F. Wittenberger" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] handling the undefined value
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 22:10:46 +0100

> 
> Well, if it was a compiler switch, off by default, it should not do
> harm.  Would it?
> 

Yes, I'll do that. I could also least remove the warning for the
(common) case of a conditional performing a self-tailcall.

How about "-picky" ?


cheers,
felix

_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to