On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:04:45AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in the test egg, the return value of > > (test name expect expr) > > is the status of the test. Is anyone making use > of this? It's been pointed out that it would be > much more useful to return the result of expr, > so that you could do > > (define x (test ...)) > > and similar. >
I'm not using the return value of any of my tests. This would be an easy change to test: make the change, run salmonella, and count how many things broke. If the count is small, keep the change. :-) -Alan -- .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
