This reflects the way scheme sees lists, which are build of pairs:
Jeha, i know. A list is a pair, but a pair is not a list. Therefore a list should be a subclass of pair. (Ok, for '() we have <null>).
And the other point is, that i can not specialized generic procedures for <pair> and <list>. Maybe it is intended (?).
Thanks Sandro _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
