Did you add optimizations to the haskell build ? I naively expected the haskell assembly to be as short as C but after some testing it was not and #haskell apparently explained to me it's haskell's runtime. But none the less I've read posts on much more complicated programs in haskell that came blazingly close to C http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/blog/2008/06/04#fast-fusion Perhaps it is true that the initialization overhead there really does slow it down for such a small program.
Then again the moment you add a single pipe into your bash script or try to do anything more complicated requiring multiple utilities your going to see much more latency. Also I also wonder if everyone is using bash as their main shell and some how that may give it an advantage since it's loaded into memory ? 2011/3/14 Tobia Conforto <[email protected]> > Here with Haskell (ghc compiled): > > [image: hello-world2.png] > > Zooming out the mammoths: > > [image: hello-world2-zoom.png] > > Tobia > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > >
<<hello-world2-zoom.png>>
<<hello-world2.png>>
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
