I was thinking about writing my own scheme interpreter for the heck of it. It might not make sense for some implementation strategies. What would be a good implementation strategy for this technique.
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Chust <[email protected]> To: George Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Chicken-users <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Mar 24, 2011 10:53 am Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Environments as Modules 2011/3/24 George Rogers <[email protected]>: > What do you think about using evaluation environments as a basis for a > module system. > [...] Hello, this may look like a good idea but I suspect it isn't very suitable for CHICKEN, because CHICKEN's evaluation environments contain no syntax information but only runtime bindings while a module system must deal with bindings in the transformer environment as well. Ciao, Thomas -- When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
