Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit: > I think it makes sense to classify a number as inexact if part > of its representation is inexact -- the same thing applies to > (/ 2 3.0), which is not the "partially exact rational 2/3.0", > using the same argument (how close is it to 2/3?)
Oh yes, absolutely. The point I was discussing was not "What is inexact?" but the related point "What is real?" -- There is / One art John Cowan <[email protected]> No more / No less http://www.ccil.org/~cowan To do / All things With art- / Lessness --Piet Hein _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
