On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:20:40PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > You do get a warning about coercion to flonum from (rational? 6/10), > but you also get the right answer, namely #t.
Right, that *should* be the answer. > BTW, I think you should go ahead and release the trunk numbers egg. > It surely has fewer bugs than the current release, even if it's not > Practically Perfect In Every Way. It's pending one patch to Chicken core currently on -hackers. Depending on which way this goes it needs a change in numbers to make it consistent. After that, yes there can be a release. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
