John Long scripsit: > Thanks, I saw that and it looks good at first glance but it's GPL. Anything > else worth looking at?
Not really. ECL and GCL are cousins (from the old Kyoto CL code base) and are both GPL. CLiCC is GPL, unmaintained, and supports only a "large subset" of CLtL1. ThinLisp is Apache, but it's also unmaintained and supports only a subset. The good news is that CMUCL and SBCL (which is a slowly diverging fork of CMUCL), at least according to Weinreb's latest (now last, alas!) survey at <http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html>, have MIPS backends for their native compilers. How well maintained they are I don't know. -- There is no real going back. Though I John Cowan may come to the Shire, it will not seem [email protected] the same; for I shall not be the same. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth, and a long burden. Where shall I find rest? --Frodo _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
