> To fix the case I rather urgently need to find at least two locations, where I dare to replicate my notes wrt. to my personal privacy. One already secured; so one more whom I can trust not to embarrass me by leaking info taking as a "remembrance to myself". Preferable outside Germany.
Are you saying that you require access to a physical server outside of Germany, on which you may bootstrap instances of Askemos to act as replication peers? If so, I'm sorry to say that I'm stuck on a slow residential cable line and haven't the cash to spare for the continuous operation of a server. Between my wife's tuition and the mortgage, we're rather tight for cash. -Dan On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger < joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> wrote: > Hello <$all>, > > we've been recently in touch regarding Askemos. Now I might need > some help, if you can. > > Until Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:55:00 +0100 the Askemos cloud ran on > a rather healthy mix of peers. > > "Pardon me?" }:-| ??? … > > On Jan 18 2013, Daniel Leslie wrote: >> >> A little off-topic for this list, but it comes up now and then so I'll >>> dive into it. Every time Askemos comes up I get a deep curiousity that has >>> me exclaiming "What is this thing?!" Especially after perusing pages like >>> this one <http://askemos.org/**Ad60e3fb123a79b2e5128915116b28** >>> 8f7/index.html/?_v=footnote&_**id=1223<http://askemos.org/Ad60e3fb123a79b2e5128915116b288f7/index.html/?_v=footnote&_id=1223> >>> >. >>> >> … >> >>> And, erm, what are the minimal steps for bootstrapping a server which can >>> collaborate on this *ethical cloud*? >>> >> > …An almost healthy mix, that is. For historic reasons three of > those eight peers of the development network, which originally where > at different locations, ended up behind a single point of failure. Since > the system promises fail-stop, I can't even add a note into my blog. > > Given the trouble I expect more. In case of trouble: all URL's > given here would/could/should be served from several locations. > *IF* the URL after the askemos.org part starts with an > "A[0-9a-f]{32}" path step, just replace the prefix with > any other replica and retry. Odds are 5:8. > > For hosts still visible see appendix. > So find the reference cited above under > http://login.softeyes.net/**Ad60e3fb123a79b2e5128915116b28** > 8f7/index.html/<http://login.softeyes.net/Ad60e3fb123a79b2e5128915116b288f7/index.html/> > or it's alternatives while I'm fixing the DNS etc. > > @Ian Grigg and Allison Stellíng: the same applies to the not-so-private > message I just sent out minutes before the disaster happend. Find the > "one-pager"-message wrt. system theory under hash code: > A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e0**97f that would be e.g. > http://login.softeyes.net/**A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e0**97f<http://login.softeyes.net/A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e097f>or > http://peanut.softeyes.net:**7080/**A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e0**97f<http://peanut.softeyes.net:7080/A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e097f>[the > latter being a plug computer at home only]. > > I just wanted to add a forgotten note beneath the T&C DISCLAIMER > http://cl.softeyes.net:8080/**A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e0** > 97f/Systems%20in%20Genetic%**20Autopoesis<http://cl.softeyes.net:8080/A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e097f/Systems%20in%20Genetic%20Autopoesis> > > This: "The hypothesis wrt. cancer would be that the strict rule > *no communication along the diagonal* where shortcut. > Leading into a 'thermodynamic chaos'." > > When those three peers disappeared. > > > > ## The Needs - Short Term > > To fix the case I rather urgently need to find at least two > locations, where I dare to replicate my notes wrt. to my personal > privacy. One already secured; so one more whom I can trust > not to embarrass me by leaking info taking as a "remembrance to > myself". Preferable outside Germany. > > > ## Minimum requirements > > BALL became a bit like the Swiss-army knife wrt. small scale > ISP needs not having a solutions widely deployed for a reason. > > For operation it needs to bind to a port at the moment. > Run as some isolated user it needs to be able to maintain the > contents of one directory. > > > ## Participate - Long Term > > The more parties joining the network, the better it should help > with privacy, safety and autonomy. > > ### Regarding the Healthiness > > So far we had > > ♣: AMD64, i386, ARM > > ♠: Chicken, Rscheme > > ♡: FreeBSD, Linux > > ♢: GPL, BSD > > for symbols see A5ae3c14013b6fe38b4aa66a2697e0**97f , the > "not so private" draft message. > > > > Thanks for your time. > > /JFW > > > ## Hosts Still Visible > > http://login.softeyes.net > http://isstvan.softeyes.net:**7080/ <http://isstvan.softeyes.net:7080/> > http://cl.softeyes.net:8080/ > http://peanut.softeyes.net:**7080/ <http://peanut.softeyes.net:7080/> > > > ................. >
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
