Hey,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Hugo Arregui <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Kristian Lein-Mathisen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Hugo, > > > > Msgpack seems like an interesting project indeed. Thanks for making an > egg > > for it! > > my pleasure! > > > I'm quite a newbie myself, but I noticed the coops egg includes the > module > > implementation directly, so you don't have to declare two modules. Maybe > > that's easier in your case too? > > I can do that, but the problem is, if I do so, the only module should > export all the procedures, include the internals one, that are needed > only for testing. > Ah, I see. Yeah, that makes sense. > > > I also noticed you're using (let () ...). Is there a reason you're not > > simply using (begin ...)? > > No really, just inertia :-). > > > I've been poking around the msgpack-repositories, they support a lot of > > languages! It's real neat that Chicken Scheme now joins in on the fun > too. > > So, looking at the node.js port, it seems like they've created > js-bindings > > to the official C library. Perhaps this might be suitable for Chicken > Scheme > > too? From what I can tell, you are reimplementing most of the > functionality > > from scratch, is that correct? > > That's right, in fact, when I started the project I think to do so, > just create the bindings, but, to be honest, I think it will more fun > if I do it from scratch. > > Gotcha! :) > > Great work, great piece of software to keep handy! > > Thanks Kristian!. > K.
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
